FYI: New zoom rpm released.
My monthly pull_zoom cron script warned me about a new zoom rpm release
with a build date of Dec 20 22:59
$ ls -l zoom*
-rw-rw-r-- 1 bittwister document
44M Nov 16 00:19 zoom-5.4.54779.1115-1.x86_64.rpm
44M Dec 7 21:08 zoom-5.4.56259.1207-1.x86_64.rpm
1.8K Dec 20 22:59 zoom-5.4.57450.1220-1.pubkey
44M Dec 20 22:59 zoom-5.4.57450.1220-1.x86_64.rpm
Looking at the above ls snippet dates, suggests it might not hurt to
move the job to weekly.
On 2/1/21 2:05 am, Bit Twister wrote:
FYI: New zoom rpm released.I think that provided the library I mentioned earlier is the right one,
My monthly pull_zoom cron script warned me about a new zoom rpm release
with a build date of Dec 20 22:59
$ ls -l zoom*
-rw-rw-r-- 1 bittwister document
44M Nov 16 00:19 zoom-5.4.54779.1115-1.x86_64.rpm
44M Dec 7 21:08 zoom-5.4.56259.1207-1.x86_64.rpm
1.8K Dec 20 22:59 zoom-5.4.57450.1220-1.pubkey
44M Dec 20 22:59 zoom-5.4.57450.1220-1.x86_64.rpm
Looking at the above ls snippet dates, suggests it might not hurt to
move the job to weekly.
even a tarball will compile. The library RPM has core libraries, and a selection of extra ones. That was the only thing blocking a tarball
compile before. I suggested adding a supplementary RPM to Bruno, but he didn't think it was appropriate.
FYI: New zoom rpm released.
My monthly pull_zoom cron script warned me about a new zoom rpm release
with a build date of Dec 20 22:59
$ ls -l zoom*
-rw-rw-r-- 1 bittwister document
44M Nov 16 00:19 zoom-5.4.54779.1115-1.x86_64.rpm
44M Dec 7 21:08 zoom-5.4.56259.1207-1.x86_64.rpm
1.8K Dec 20 22:59 zoom-5.4.57450.1220-1.pubkey
44M Dec 20 22:59 zoom-5.4.57450.1220-1.x86_64.rpm
Looking at the above ls snippet dates, suggests it might not hurt to
move the job to weekly.
On 2/1/21 2:05 am, Bit Twister wrote:
FYI: New zoom rpm released.I just tried to install Zoom. The dependencies looked promising, but
My monthly pull_zoom cron script warned me about a new zoom rpm release
with a build date of Dec 20 22:59
$ ls -l zoom*
-rw-rw-r-- 1 bittwister document
44M Nov 16 00:19 zoom-5.4.54779.1115-1.x86_64.rpm
44M Dec 7 21:08 zoom-5.4.56259.1207-1.x86_64.rpm
1.8K Dec 20 22:59 zoom-5.4.57450.1220-1.pubkey
44M Dec 20 22:59 zoom-5.4.57450.1220-1.x86_64.rpm
Looking at the above ls snippet dates, suggests it might not hurt to
move the job to weekly.
what I got was the client for story-type games.It was Release zoom-1.1.5-10.mga7.
On Thu, 14 Jan 2021 20:11:46 +1100, Doug Laidlaw wrote:
On 2/1/21 2:05 am, Bit Twister wrote:
FYI: New zoom rpm released.I just tried to install Zoom. The dependencies looked promising,
My monthly pull_zoom cron script warned me about a new zoom rpm
release with a build date of Dec 20 22:59
$ ls -l zoom*
-rw-rw-r-- 1 bittwister document
44M Nov 16 00:19 zoom-5.4.54779.1115-1.x86_64.rpm
44M Dec 7 21:08 zoom-5.4.56259.1207-1.x86_64.rpm
1.8K Dec 20 22:59 zoom-5.4.57450.1220-1.pubkey
44M Dec 20 22:59 zoom-5.4.57450.1220-1.x86_64.rpm
Looking at the above ls snippet dates, suggests it might not hurt
to move the job to weekly.
but what I got was the client for story-type games.It was Release
zoom-1.1.5-10.mga7.
That is correct. That is because zoom is the name of a released game
under Mageia.
There is a new zoom meeting released
1.8K Jan 10 22:20 zoom-5.4.57862.0110-1.pubkey
44M Jan 10 22:20 zoom-5.4.57862.0110-1.x86_64.rpm
zoom rpm needs to downloaded from
https://zoom.us/client/latest/zoom_x86_64.rpm
Hello Bit!
Thursday January 14 2021 14:25, Bit Twister wrote to All:
On Thu, 14 Jan 2021 20:11:46 +1100, Doug Laidlaw wrote:
On 2/1/21 2:05 am, Bit Twister wrote:
FYI: New zoom rpm released.I just tried to install Zoom. The dependencies looked promising,
My monthly pull_zoom cron script warned me about a new zoom rpm
release with a build date of Dec 20 22:59
$ ls -l zoom*
-rw-rw-r-- 1 bittwister document
44M Nov 16 00:19 zoom-5.4.54779.1115-1.x86_64.rpm
44M Dec 7 21:08 zoom-5.4.56259.1207-1.x86_64.rpm
1.8K Dec 20 22:59 zoom-5.4.57450.1220-1.pubkey
44M Dec 20 22:59 zoom-5.4.57450.1220-1.x86_64.rpm
Looking at the above ls snippet dates, suggests it might not hurt
to move the job to weekly.
but what I got was the client for story-type games.It was Release
zoom-1.1.5-10.mga7.
That is correct. That is because zoom is the name of a released game
under Mageia.
There is a new zoom meeting released
1.8K Jan 10 22:20 zoom-5.4.57862.0110-1.pubkey
44M Jan 10 22:20 zoom-5.4.57862.0110-1.x86_64.rpm
zoom rpm needs to downloaded from
https://zoom.us/client/latest/zoom_x86_64.rpm
Using mga 7.1 I get :
sudo urpmi zoom_x86_64.rpm
A requested package cannot be installed:
zoom-5.4.57862.0110-1.x86_64 (due to unsatisfied freetype[>= 2.6])
Is there a trick to this ?
Using mga 7.1 I get :
sudo urpmi zoom_x86_64.rpm
A requested package cannot be installed:
zoom-5.4.57862.0110-1.x86_64 (due to unsatisfied freetype[>= 2.6])
Is there a trick to this ?
On Fri, 15 Jan 2021 17:55:48 +0000, Vincent Coen wrote:
Hello Bit!
Thursday January 14 2021 14:25, Bit Twister wrote to All:
On Thu, 14 Jan 2021 20:11:46 +1100, Doug Laidlaw wrote:
On 2/1/21 2:05 am, Bit Twister wrote:
FYI: New zoom rpm released.I just tried to install Zoom. The dependencies looked promising,
My monthly pull_zoom cron script warned me about a new zoom rpm
release with a build date of Dec 20 22:59
$ ls -l zoom*
-rw-rw-r-- 1 bittwister document
44M Nov 16 00:19 zoom-5.4.54779.1115-1.x86_64.rpm
44M Dec 7 21:08 zoom-5.4.56259.1207-1.x86_64.rpm
1.8K Dec 20 22:59 zoom-5.4.57450.1220-1.pubkey
44M Dec 20 22:59 zoom-5.4.57450.1220-1.x86_64.rpm
Looking at the above ls snippet dates, suggests it might not hurt
to move the job to weekly.
but what I got was the client for story-type games.It was Release
zoom-1.1.5-10.mga7.
That is correct. That is because zoom is the name of a released game
under Mageia.
There is a new zoom meeting released
1.8K Jan 10 22:20 zoom-5.4.57862.0110-1.pubkey
44M Jan 10 22:20 zoom-5.4.57862.0110-1.x86_64.rpm
zoom rpm needs to downloaded from
https://zoom.us/client/latest/zoom_x86_64.rpm
Using mga 7.1 I get :
sudo urpmi zoom_x86_64.rpm
A requested package cannot be installed:
zoom-5.4.57862.0110-1.x86_64 (due to unsatisfied freetype[>= 2.6])
Is there a trick to this ?
I read somewhere you are supposed to use
urpmi --allow-nodeps zoom_x86_64.rpm
It is also suggested to download the pubkey
https://zoom.us/linux/download/pubkey
and import it
rpm --import zoom.pubkey
On 2021-01-15, Vincent Coen <VBCoen@gmail.com> wrote:
Using mga 7.1 I get :
sudo urpmi zoom_x86_64.rpm
A requested package cannot be installed:
zoom-5.4.57862.0110-1.x86_64 (due to unsatisfied freetype[>= 2.6])
Is there a trick to this ?
Yes. Use the --nodeps to rpm.
or
--allow-nodeps for urpmi
The freetype for Mageia has a slightly different name from that for
Redhat.
lib64freetype6-2.9.1-4.1.mga7.tainted instead of freetype.
Warning-- using Zoom on Mageia can be messy.
a) You must disallow the setting of
QT_PLUGIN_PATH or unset it before running zoom
Mageia unlike all other distros, sets this variable, and zoom crashes immediately if it is set.
b) Under KDE Plasma, you are liable to not be able to share. It will
look fine to you when you share your screen, but everyone else will
see an unreadable flickering/flashing image. Running under XFCE works.
There is some suggestion that one of the Desktop Effects under Plasma
is what causes teh problem, or the compositor, and that atl-Shift-F12
will turn it off and allow Zoom to work properly. I have already water
for more time than I have trying to track down the bug, and the zoom
people seem to be uninterested in fixing the bug.
Hello William!
Friday January 15 2021 20:00, William Unruh wrote to All:
On 2021-01-15, Vincent Coen <VBCoen@gmail.com> wrote:
Using mga 7.1 I get :
sudo urpmi zoom_x86_64.rpm
A requested package cannot be installed:
zoom-5.4.57862.0110-1.x86_64 (due to unsatisfied freetype[>= 2.6])
Is there a trick to this ?
Yes. Use the --nodeps to rpm.
or
--allow-nodeps for urpmi
The freetype for Mageia has a slightly different name from that for
Redhat.
lib64freetype6-2.9.1-4.1.mga7.tainted instead of freetype.
Noted thanks I will install that any way.
Warning-- using Zoom on Mageia can be messy.
a) You must disallow the setting of
QT_PLUGIN_PATH or unset it before running zoom
Mageia unlike all other distros, sets this variable, and zoom crashes immediately if it is set.
b) Under KDE Plasma, you are liable to not be able to share. It will
look fine to you when you share your screen, but everyone else will
see an unreadable flickering/flashing image. Running under XFCE works.
There is some suggestion that one of the Desktop Effects under Plasma
is what causes teh problem, or the compositor, and that atl-Shift-F12
will turn it off and allow Zoom to work properly. I have already water
for more time than I have trying to track down the bug, and the zoom
people seem to be uninterested in fixing the bug.
OK, there are enough issues for me to keep clear of it. I was slightly concerned when I could not see the sources for validation.
Will stick to using it under Windoz on a laptop for family and council meetings etc.
Vincent
You can get rid of the QT_PLUGIN_PATH by editing
/etc/profile.d/60qt5.sh and /etc/profile.d/60qt5.sh
and getting rid of the lines containing QT_PLUGIN_PATH
On Sat, 16 Jan 2021 16:55:31 -0000 (UTC), William Unruh wrote:
You can get rid of the QT_PLUGIN_PATH by editing
/etc/profile.d/60qt5.sh and /etc/profile.d/60qt5.sh
and getting rid of the lines containing QT_PLUGIN_PATH
I would suggest that is somewhat of a poor hack.
You run the risk of the modified files being overwritten by an update
having to do with those files.
You can use a link or a file in /etc/profile.d/ to unset the desired variables. For example /etc/profile.d/zoon.sh/cshBetter give it a number higher than 60 or you are liable to have it
Another option is a wrapper script in /usr/bin that sets the desired environment then calls zoom executable.
On 2021-01-16, Bit Twister <BitTwister@mouse-potato.com> wrote:
On Sat, 16 Jan 2021 16:55:31 -0000 (UTC), William Unruh wrote:
You can get rid of the QT_PLUGIN_PATH by editing
/etc/profile.d/60qt5.sh and /etc/profile.d/60qt5.sh
and getting rid of the lines containing QT_PLUGIN_PATH
I would suggest that is somewhat of a poor hack.
You run the risk of the modified files being overwritten by an update
having to do with those files.
Of course. Better would have been if Mageia had never done it in the
first place, or that they issued a bug fix for 7.1. Two years ago, it
was pointed out that Mageia had violated the direct advice of the QT5 developers. It took till this Dec for them to fix this in cauldron. I
have not seen that they fixed it in Mga7, but they may have, in which
case your worry is not relevant.
Better give it a number higher than 60 or you are liable to have it
You can use a link or a file in /etc/profile.d/ to unset the desired
variables. For example /etc/profile.d/zoon.sh/csh
unset before it is set and then set:-) (Or are unnumbered things always
run after numbered things?).
Another would be to write a
script to unset it, and have cron run it every 5 min :-)
(I presume you meant /etc/profile.d/zoom.{sh,csh} in bash-speak. As it
is it looks like csh is a subdirectory of zoon.sh)
On Sat, 16 Jan 2021 18:10:19 -0000 (UTC), William Unruh wrote:
On 2021-01-16, Bit Twister <BitTwister@mouse-potato.com> wrote:
On Sat, 16 Jan 2021 16:55:31 -0000 (UTC), William Unruh wrote:
You can get rid of the QT_PLUGIN_PATH by editing
/etc/profile.d/60qt5.sh and /etc/profile.d/60qt5.sh
and getting rid of the lines containing QT_PLUGIN_PATH
I would suggest that is somewhat of a poor hack.
You run the risk of the modified files being overwritten by an update
having to do with those files.
Of course. Better would have been if Mageia had never done it in the
first place, or that they issued a bug fix for 7.1. Two years ago, it
was pointed out that Mageia had violated the direct advice of the QT5
developers. It took till this Dec for them to fix this in cauldron. I
have not seen that they fixed it in Mga7, but they may have, in which
case your worry is not relevant.
Better give it a number higher than 60 or you are liable to have it
You can use a link or a file in /etc/profile.d/ to unset the desired
variables. For example /etc/profile.d/zoon.sh/csh
unset before it is set and then set:-) (Or are unnumbered things always
run after numbered things?).
Scripts are usually executed in normal ASCII order. Take a look at
ls -1 /etc/profile.d/
Another would be to write a
script to unset it, and have cron run it every 5 min :-)
An absolute waste of time/resource. That would only unset it for that
cron job.
(I presume you meant /etc/profile.d/zoom.{sh,csh} in bash-speak. As it
is it looks like csh is a subdirectory of zoon.sh)
Sorry, you are correct.
There is an excellent web page on Mageia Wiki explaining how to install
Zoom on Mageia using the Fedora rpm package.
https://wiki.mageia.org/en/Using_Zoom_communication_application
I was unable to install Zoom successfully until I followed the
instructions on the above page. I can verify it works ok in Mageia 8
Beta2. I have a weekly meeting with our Linux Computer Club and haven't
had any problems.
[/root ]# rpm -q zoom
zoom-5.3.472687.1012-1 (version number)
Leo Kavanagh
FYI: New zoom rpm released.
My monthly pull_zoom cron script warned me about a new zoom rpm release
with a build date of Dec 20 22:59
$ ls -l zoom*
-rw-rw-r-- 1 bittwister document
44M Nov 16 00:19 zoom-5.4.54779.1115-1.x86_64.rpm
44M Dec 7 21:08 zoom-5.4.56259.1207-1.x86_64.rpm
1.8K Dec 20 22:59 zoom-5.4.57450.1220-1.pubkey
44M Dec 20 22:59 zoom-5.4.57450.1220-1.x86_64.rpm
Looking at the above ls snippet dates, suggests it might not hurt to
move the job to weekly.
On 2021-01-01, Bit Twister <BitTwister@mouse-potato.com> wrote:
FYI: New zoom rpm released.
My monthly pull_zoom cron script warned me about a new zoom rpm release
with a build date of Dec 20 22:59
$ ls -l zoom*
-rw-rw-r-- 1 bittwister document
44M Nov 16 00:19 zoom-5.4.54779.1115-1.x86_64.rpm
44M Dec 7 21:08 zoom-5.4.56259.1207-1.x86_64.rpm
1.8K Dec 20 22:59 zoom-5.4.57450.1220-1.pubkey
44M Dec 20 22:59 zoom-5.4.57450.1220-1.x86_64.rpm
Looking at the above ls snippet dates, suggests it might not hurt to
move the job to weekly.
Actually where do you download those zoom rpms from? From zoom you just
get a non-descript zoom_x86_64.rpm which gives no idea what the version
is.
Yes, I know. But Bit is showing that he gets the full version of theThis is the download page:
https://zoom.us/download
Click on "Linux type" and select Fedora, select 32 or 64 bit and click Download. zoom_x86_64.rpm size 43.2MB will download.I change the name
to 'zoomFedora-x86_64.rpm' to avoid confusion. The GPG key is also
available on this page.
Leo Kavanagh
On 2021-01-17, Leo <kavanaghleo@gmail.com> wrote:zoom_x86_64.rpm.
...
Yes, I know. But Bit is showing that he gets the full version of theThis is the download page:
https://zoom.us/download
Click on "Linux type" and select Fedora, select 32 or 64 bit and click
Download. zoom_x86_64.rpm size 43.2MB will download.I change the name
to 'zoomFedora-x86_64.rpm' to avoid confusion. The GPG key is also
available on this page.
zoom file named with the full release number, not the totally useless
To what site does he go to see the full rpm name and download the full
file name?
On 2021-01-17, Leo <kavanaghleo@gmail.com> wrote:_____________________________________
...
This is the download page:
https://zoom.us/download
Click on "Linux type" and select Fedora, select 32 or 64 bit and click
Download. zoom_x86_64.rpm size 43.2MB will download.I change the name
to 'zoomFedora-x86_64.rpm' to avoid confusion. The GPG key is also
available on this page.
Yes, I know. But Bit is showing that he gets the full version of thezoom_x86_64.rpm.
zoom file named with the full release number, not the totally useless
To what site does he go to see the full rpm name and download the full
file name?
Leo Kavanagh
On Sun, 17 Jan 2021 17:28:23 -0500, William Unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> wrote:file.
On 2021-01-17, Leo <kavanaghleo@gmail.com> wrote:
...
Yes, I know. But Bit is showing that he gets the full version of theThis is the download page:
https://zoom.us/download
Click on "Linux type" and select Fedora, select 32 or 64 bit and click
Download. zoom_x86_64.rpm size 43.2MB will download.I change the name
to 'zoomFedora-x86_64.rpm' to avoid confusion. The GPG key is also
available on this page.
zoom file named with the full release number, not the totally useless zoom_x86_64.rpm.
To what site does he go to see the full rpm name and download the full
file name?
Easiest way is to download it first, then extact the info and rename the
$ rpm -q -i ./zoom_x86_64.rpm |head -n 11
Name : zoom
Version : 5.4.57862.0110
Release : 1
Architecture: x86_64
Install Date: (not installed)
Group : default
Size : 186610144
License : see https://www.zoom.us/
Signature : RSA/SHA1, 2021-01-10T23:23:54 EST, Key ID b903bf1861a7c71d Source RPM : zoom-5.4.57862.0110-1.src.rpm
Build Date : 2021-01-10T23:20:59 EST
Regards, Dave Hodgins
On 2021-01-17, David W. Hodgins <dwhodgins@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
On Sun, 17 Jan 2021 17:28:23 -0500, William Unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> wrote: >>
On 2021-01-17, Leo <kavanaghleo@gmail.com> wrote:
...
Yes, I know. But Bit is showing that he gets the full version of theThis is the download page:
https://zoom.us/download
Click on "Linux type" and select Fedora, select 32 or 64 bit and click >>>> Download. zoom_x86_64.rpm size 43.2MB will download.I change the name >>>> to 'zoomFedora-x86_64.rpm' to avoid confusion. The GPG key is also
available on this page.
zoom file named with the full release number, not the totally useless zoom_x86_64.rpm.
To what site does he go to see the full rpm name and download the full
file name?
Easiest way is to download it first, then extact the info and rename the file.
$ rpm -q -i ./zoom_x86_64.rpm |head -n 11
You probably mean rpm -qip ./zoom_x86_64.rpm
Not sure what web site Bit uses, he may not yet have seen the last few postings on this N.G. asking for the URL.
Hopefully Bit will read the last few posts and reply.
The output of rpm -qi ./zoom_x86_64.rpm and rpm -qip ./zoom_x86_64.rpm are identical. The option p is only needed if a ftp or http style URL is used, not a local file that's already been downloaded.
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 296 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 82:27:05 |
Calls: | 6,658 |
Calls today: | 4 |
Files: | 12,203 |
Messages: | 5,333,433 |
Posted today: | 1 |