• xmpp

    From Benny Pedersen@39:140/0 to All on Sun Oct 29 16:56:56 2017
    Hello All!

    i think we could do amiga echomail in xmpp (jabber is well supported anyware)

    just a tought, let me know if i am the only stupid sysop here :)

    connect to me@xmpp.junc.eu give your nodenumber

    i am dropping icq, skype, msn, and all the remaining crap


    Regards Benny

    ... there can only be one way of life, and it works :)

    --- Msged/LNX 6.2.0 (Linux/4.12.12-gentoo (i686))
    * Origin: I will always keep a PC running CPM 3.0 (39:140/0)
  • From Wilfred van Velzen@39:150/200 to Benny Pedersen on Mon Oct 30 09:37:09 2017
    Hi Benny,

    On 2017-10-29 16:56:56, you wrote to All:

    let me know if i am the only stupid sysop here :)

    Yes. ;)

    Bye, Wilfred.

    --- FMail-lnx64 2.1.0.18-B20170815
    * Origin: FMail development HQ (39:150/200)
  • From Torsten Bamberg@39:17/0 to Benny Pedersen on Mon Oct 30 18:34:55 2017
    Hallo Benny!

    29.10.2017 16:56, Benny Pedersen schrieb an All:

    i think we could do amiga echomail in xmpp (jabber is well supported anyware)
    [...]
    i am dropping icq, skype, msn, and all the remaining crap
    Echomail via skype? Ough...
    Did you code echomail into the skype videostream like the hidden messages in pictures, or, did you write down the echomail messages letter by letter so we have to write them down, while watching your stream? ;-)

    Honesly, I prefer the 'old' style, getting echomail via binkd/pots an old style arced pakets. :-)

    Or, if this is not possible for you, just copy the pakets from your outbound onto a sd-card, and send the card via snailmail or pigeon. ;-)

    Regards Benny
    Bye/2 Torsten

    ... MAILBOX: Up 02d 02h 22m (BTUp2V1.5)
    --- GoldED+ 1.1.5-17
    * Origin: DatenBahn BBS Hamburg (39:17/0)
  • From Ingo Juergensmann@39:170/400 to Torsten Bamberg on Mon Oct 30 23:18:06 2017
    Hello Torsten!

    30 Oct 17 18:34, you wrote to Benny Pedersen:

    i think we could do amiga echomail in xmpp (jabber is well
    supported anyware)
    [...]
    i am dropping icq, skype, msn, and all the remaining crap
    Echomail via skype? Ough...

    He mentioned to use XMPP as a transport layer, not Skype...

    Did you code echomail into the skype videostream like the hidden
    messages in pictures, or, did you write down the echomail messages
    letter by letter so we have to write them down, while watching your stream? ;-)

    XMPP can send files. Or you could even think about sending them as uuencoded messages. I you like you could even use end to end encryption using OTR or OMEMO XEPs.

    Honesly, I prefer the 'old' style, getting echomail via binkd/pots an
    old style arced pakets. :-)

    Me too! I think this would only be a proof-of-concept. It would get interesting if you drive this concept even further and use multi-user-chat/group-chat functionality in XMPP to distribute echomail packets. But then again you could replace echomail at all by using group-chats as echoareas. But wait! You can already do this using NNTP and newsgroups.
    So, in fact you gain very little by using XMPP. Maybe one of the small things you would gain would be Presence status of all connected nodes.

    So, yeah, it would have some charme to have this as a proof-of-concept, but that's all I think... and I don't think that it's worth the effort given the current size of Fidonet. We have other things to care about...

    Ingo


    --- GoldED+/LNX 1.1.5--b20170303
    * Origin: AmigaXess - back in FidoNet after 17 years (39:170/400)
  • From Torsten Bamberg@39:17/0 to Ingo Juergensmann on Tue Oct 31 00:36:40 2017
    Hallo Ingo!

    30.10.2017 23:18, Ingo Juergensmann schrieb an Torsten Bamberg:

    i think we could do amiga echomail in xmpp (jabber is well
    supported anyware)
    [...]
    i am dropping icq, skype, msn, and all the remaining crap
    Echomail via skype? Ough...

    He mentioned to use XMPP as a transport layer, not Skype...
    I know. I did understand his meaning, but I didn't give a proper answer.
    I just interpret 'echomail' and 'skype'.

    XMPP can send files. Or you could even think about sending them as uuencoded messages. I you like you could even use end to end
    encryption using OTR or OMEMO XEPs.
    Ahm... I didn't get this. ;-)

    Honesly, I prefer the 'old' style, getting echomail via
    binkd/pots an old style arced pakets. :-)
    Me too! I think this would only be a proof-of-concept. It would get interesting if you drive this concept even further and use multi-user-chat/group-chat functionality in XMPP to distribute
    echomail packets. But then again you could replace echomail at all by using group-chats as echoareas. But wait! You can already do this
    using NNTP and newsgroups. So, in fact you gain very little by using
    XMPP. Maybe one of the small things you would gain would be Presence status of all connected nodes.
    Anyway, it doesn't make sence, to use high level tcp protocols. Currently our binkp is quite safe. Otherwise, binkp is a point to point connection.
    To destribute mails into a group protocoll we need any different, than a huge crowd of scripts and some propretary software.

    To implement a usefull group protokoll, maybe all pkt's can be encapsulated and encrypted into a smtp connection using bcc.
    It's just a idea.

    BUT, a proper working tosser does this by default. A mailer is nothing else than a mailer. To stuck all things together, mixes all things, but it is a mixture, without beeing clear. Gosh, my english gettin worse...

    So, yeah, it would have some charme to have this as a
    proof-of-concept, but that's all I think... and I don't think that
    it's worth the effort given the current size of Fidonet. We have other things to care about...
    Well, you've got to look at differnt things.

    Ingo
    Bye/2 Torsten

    ... MAILBOX: Up 02d 08h 55m (BTUp2V1.5)
    --- GoldED+ 1.1.5-17
    * Origin: DatenBahn BBS Hamburg (39:17/0)
  • From Benny Pedersen@39:140/0 to Wilfred van Velzen on Tue Jan 16 05:59:40 2018
    Hello Wilfred!

    30 Oct 2017 09:37, Wilfred van Velzen wrote to Benny Pedersen:

    let me know if i am the only stupid sysop here :)
    Yes. ;)

    not likely


    Regards Benny

    ... there can only be one way of life, and it works :)

    --- Msged/LNX 6.2.0 (Linux/4.9.76-gentoo (i686))
    * Origin: I will always keep a PC running CPM 3.0 (39:140/0)
  • From Benny Pedersen@39:140/0 to Torsten Bamberg on Tue Jan 16 06:00:48 2018
    Hello Torsten!

    30 Oct 2017 18:34, Torsten Bamberg wrote to Benny Pedersen:

    Or, if this is not possible for you, just copy the pakets from your outbound onto a sd-card, and send the card via snailmail or pigeon.
    ;-)

    and wait more then a week to get it delivered from the postmann ? :)


    Regards Benny

    ... there can only be one way of life, and it works :)

    --- Msged/LNX 6.2.0 (Linux/4.9.76-gentoo (i686))
    * Origin: I will always keep a PC running CPM 3.0 (39:140/0)
  • From Torsten Bamberg@39:17/0 to Benny Pedersen on Sat Jan 20 12:50:44 2018
    Hallo Benny!

    16.01.2018 06:00, Benny Pedersen schrieb an Torsten Bamberg:

    Or, if this is not possible for you, just copy the pakets from
    your outbound onto a sd-card, and send the card via snailmail or
    pigeon. ;-)
    and wait more then a week to get it delivered from the postmann ? :)
    Why not? Usually our local postal delivery services (dhl) is quite fast. Otherwise, some other postal delivery services aren't fast. Sometimes I think, they ride a pigeon around the world, to deliver a letter. ;-)

    Give a try, and you'll be knowing.

    Regards Benny
    Bye/2 Torsten

    ... MAILBOX: up 9d 15h 18m load: 28 proc, 112 threads (tbupv1.0)
    --- GoldED+ 1.1.5
    * Origin: DatenBahn BBS Hamburg (39:17/0)